From what I have observed most public debate regarding science revolves around two issues:
1) Climate Change due to human influence on the environment
2) Evolution of life on Earth due to long term natural selection
How do you determine what to believe (or not) regarding these theories?
What kind of evidence would convince you to change your mind?
Why do you place trust (or not) in the consensus of the experts in these fields?
Given infinite resources, how would you determine the "truth"?
No idea if anybody thought of this before, but how about just apply the
scientific-method ? Essentially what im suggesting here, is to do opposite of what unscientific "career-scientists" such as Richard Dawkins is doing.
This> You try to prove wrong whatever you tried to believe. = science
Not this> You try to prove whatever you believe to be right. = religion