Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Piece of Shit Bitcoiners et al. Hall of Fame
by
AlexGR
on 03/04/2016, 09:50:31 UTC
I just don't see how pretending to not have committed scams can be tolerated. It would be different if Evan stopped lying about intentionally doing the instamine instead of claiming it was an accident which I have explained is implausible because every lead developer will be monitoring his coin carefully on launch to see the coins are being issued at the correct rate. It doesn't take hours to make that determination.

Implausible? DASH had a failed launch and RE-launched.

Now, if it aborted a second launch and did a third one, then you'd hear: "ahhh... the highly qualified dev made it appear, with his 3 launches, that he is some kind of incompetent dev that can't even create a clone-coin so as to divert miners elsewhere. He knew that noone would bother mining a joke coin and he intentionally and maliciously pretended that darkcoin would be such in order to mine it himself"

See? You can never win. But Evan went on and proposed an airdrop to fix the distribution which was voted down. The only thing you said about this is ..."sockpuppets".

Now, remember, Darkcoin had Litecoin's codebase, although altered in certain parameters. Still, the diff readjustment had similar issues as Litecoin - which in itself was instamined:

http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins#litecoin

"...we see a well defined curve that demonstrates instamining occurred, showing 450,000 LTC being created in less than 6 hours."

So, why didn't Litecoin's dev abort the launch?
Why didn't Litecoin's dev propose to fix the distribution, like Evan? Ooops.

Plus:

Why aren't you arguing about putting Litecoin dev on the list?
Why aren't you arguing putting every single PoW/PoS hybrid, where PoW is over in a few days, in the list?
Why aren't you arguing in putting every single PoS coin dev in the list, if you believe PoS coins are inherently scammy?
Why aren't you arguing in putting every single ICO coin dev in the list, if you believe ICOs are inherently scammy?
Why aren't you arguing in enriching the list with every single dev that launched a scamcoin back in 13/14/15 with the sole intention of stealing people's money, where the dev took money and left, etc etc? I'm talking about actual scams where people lost their money and the coin's marketcap went to zero.

As for satoshi, the coins he controls are not 1% (or 150.000)... numbers floating around are in the range of 1mn+.