Helping investors make money is good, but doing it in such a way that makes it impossible for that to ever be widely adopted because you won't get many people to invest in the ecosystem built around a scam, means that this has no positive benefit. If Evan was honest in his presentation on the website, I would have nothing to say other than to say I wouldn't invest, advise others not to based on the history, and perhaps mention the possible liability of SEC and FinCEN action. But the way Evan deceives the public, means he is going to give our entire sector a bad reputation around nefarious deception. The scam can't be hidden forever. It won't just go away. It will be the poster child of altcoin corruption that people look back on.
1. Your debate starts and ends at the point where you consider Evan's actions immoral. You are entitled to think that and nobody can tell you anything about it.
Please define the difference between a scam and unethical (and probably illegal in the USA and perhaps the EU at least) deception of investors?
I am still waiting for you reply. You chose to ignore this challenge, thus you lost the debate.