As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime:
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papers
The globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds.
http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papers
The globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds.
For a person with such a breadth of understanding regarding global expansion of totalitarianism, why would you insist on others publicly disclosing stuff like their cryptoholdings, when, tomorrow for example, crypto could be illegal and all such posts might be admissions of possession and thus grounds for confiscation?
Cripes man, did this point completely fly over your head that you are the one who is demanding that everyone disclose everything so we can count and prove all the victims.
If I say "I had 100 bitcoins and you stole them from me" then I'm not admitting possession in real time. I *had* them. I don't *currently* have them thus such information would not be incriminating in a future where cryptocurrency becomes illegal. You cannot break the law with retro-active effect in any serious constitutional state. The law must first exist so that you can the break it. So if I say, right now, you stole my BTCs, and a law comes in effect next year saying I'm not allowed to have BTCs, I've not broken any laws.
Now you are arguing the Statute-of-Limitations can turn an unquantified but generally exposed "rip off" into a legal activity and thus there was never anybody ripped off.
Holy shit. You just verified for everyone the way your twisted criminal mind rationalizes Evan's what I allege is to be illegal activity.
Note it is 10 years in the USA from the last act for financial crimes, so Evan won't be safe from criminal proceedings until 2026 at the earliest.
I am arguing it should be sufficient to just declare Evan a sleazy scammer who rips off people by designing a scam to control the float and manipulate the price and volume, as well printing press coins out of thin air masternode scheme, handing them to insiders, and dumping them on the market.
Ok, so you are not OK with proving the scam so you just want to declare people "sleazy scammers".
We feel we sufficiently proved the scam to argue for him being on a list of who this community thinks scammed and ripped off some of us in the community.
Everyone's innocent until proven guilty, you know...
Not in terms of public opinion. You seem to realize that, which is why you are desperately trying to obscure the truth here.
And, if you call people scammers when they haven't actually scammed people, that's a criminal offense in itself.
Let's take it to court and subpoena all the records so you can have your proof of the scam and a conviction in a court-of-law (civil or criminal or both) of the scammer. I will counter-sue for damages and seek an injunction to escrow/lockup DRK masternode developer funds to cover costs of losing the case. If those collapse in value due to the court case, will seek an injunction to seize for escrow against Evan and accomplice's real assets. Based on the manipulative nature of what has transpired, I would expect Evan and accomplices to try to hide and dispose of real assets and would argue that to the court.