Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Gun freedom advocates - what weapons shouldn't be legally available?
by
Dalkore
on 08/01/2013, 19:28:04 UTC
Oh, so close! Tell me, who starts the companies that start the companies that start the companies...?

And certainly subsidiaries aren't the only way that companies get started, are they?

And who runs those companies?

If this is how you are going to use logic then we are not actually debating anything of substance and if you are truly support nuclear weapons in the hands of the private citizens then you are mentally unstable...

My point is that you were advocating the same thing:
Maybe an asteroid mining company with very stringent rules and regulations.

Mining companies are comprised of, and run by, private citizens. Or does the collectivization turn them into something else?

A company heavily regulated for their access to use nuclear weapons is far and away a different thing than a private citizen.  You know that so I don't understand why you even bringing this point up?   

I have a guess and I stated it above.  You already pulled that little stunt with the waving a gun in public in which you either lied or were just purposely being ignorant to the grammar used.   I am seriously starting to doubt your intellectual honesty.   I am seeing something of quite a contrast from reading many of your statements and positions.