Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Gun freedom advocates - what weapons shouldn't be legally available?
by
myrkul
on 10/01/2013, 17:22:25 UTC
A nuke probably $8mil. They will likely have a damn good reason for whatever they are buying if it's expensive enough.
(I can't see a random unstable nutcase coming up with $8mil for a nuke. It's even hard to imagine someone like that coming up with $1,000 for a machine gun.

You have no imagination or common sense.   You think there are not unstable people that are rich or have vendetta or agenda.   You're as naive as they come.  You must just be a troll to say this utter nonsense.

I'm really disappointed in you, Dalkore. You're not even trying to present rational arguments, anymore. You can do better.

There is nothing rational with the argument that a dollar amount like $8mil is what will keep this type of weapon technology out of the hands of unstable people.   NOTHING RATIONAL.

Oh? Unstable people are, by definition, unstable. Are unstable people typically goal-oriented enough to put that much effort into something?

Ask yourself this: if what you fear is unstable folks getting control of nukes and killing people, why do you entrust them to people with proven track records of genocide?

You're right, you don't leave it to chance. You give the nukes to the unstable people.