No but you do have a raging hard-on for Dooglus and given that your typical obsessive rant threads are their usual fail for you in your anti-Dooglus quest, it isn't too much of a leap of faith to consider whether you'd latch on to creating an 'Honest' ponzi in the hope of stirring trouble between myself and Dooglus as we have a different opinion on the matter of 'honest' ponzis.

Then there is the fact that 'Honestbit' knows way more about both Dooglus and the DT system for a newb, as well as his penchant for posting quotes from your anti-Dooglus threads.

It doesn't escape my attention that the obsessive use of logical fallacy in both your arguments is awfully similar but, hey, personality disorders and intellectual dishonesty go hand in hand anyway. I do know he is lying about this being his first account, but I also know I could be wrong about him being you. In any event it is irrelevant, his 'honest' ponzi isn't honest at all because it is open to participation from random internet strangers who may not be fully-informed as to the nature of the 'scheme'. This means that money which would otherwise not have been deposited becomes part of the system and is taken by the operator and those participants who also know that their share could be coming from somebody who would otherwise not consent.

Fully informed consent is the ultimate basis for secular morality, after all, 'Honestbit'. So one cannot claim a system to be 'honest' if it transgresses the boundaries of fully informed consent.