I am trying to understand why you think that is it impossible that the halving is already priced in.
I am not suggesting that billionaires should "go all in" or that Soros is in any way involved.
I am suggesting that since the halving and corresponding reduced supply are already known, they have already influenced the market.
How do you counter that argument?
dooglus, you're way too intelligent of a guy to be wasting your time trying to understand why this guy believes this thing.
I've never encountered this guy before and wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt.
But it does appear that he doesn't have a valid argument. He seems to have ignored my question after attempting to fob me off with logical fallacies re. billionaires and Soros. I guess he's simply talking his book.
Selling coin to yourself can preserve profits, if it's keeping the price up. Paying the fee to the exchange is trivial
Whenever I sell coin to myself to preserve profits I do it OTC, in person. That way there are no fees at all and no counterparty risk.
Just kidding. How does selling coin to yourself "keep the price up"? Isn't that crazy talk?