oh?
Well read this:
the governance system (what was previously the budget system) will explicitly have a system for tracking what's happening in our economy
Dash is money, not a venture capital investor. Venture capital companies have governance systems for "tracking what's happening in our economy" but money sure as hell does not since the whole point of "sound money" is that once you have it you are at liberty to do whatever you want with it.
These two objectives just have wildly conflicting priorities.
Dash's priorities IMO should be aligned with those of a monetary medium. i.e.
[1] - continue to consolidate the technology behind improving fungibility and security
[2] - implement a commercial API
Those two priorities are consistent with those of monetary media. Dash is on solid ground.
The governance system is there to support development of the monetary token - not the other way around IM(H)O.
Thanks for your unsolicited opinion and advice, but you of all people should by now know
Dash is only what Evan does. No more, no less. If you don't like that dictatorship and Bus Factor of 1, you know how to find the exit.

Don't worry, the "zomg Dash is the next KickStarter" nonsense won't be followed up on with any serious effort. It's obviously just a one-off attempt to hype and pump (just like Evan's "we will implement ring signatures" fake promise).