... I'd probably have to sell all my Dash just for the pleasure of not having to read them.
Isn't this the source of our problem? We can't read everything. If there's 10 companies using the system and an average of 5 pages of reports per month, you'd need to sit down for a few hours to get through it all. Masternode operators are simply unable to perform such a task, therefore we must find another solution.
I'm considering some sort of endorsement committee, which is elected by the network to review what's happening and produce short overviews. We could start with just a simple business committee, to review the legitimacy of the projects. There could even be multiple of these committees eventually and a masternode operator could mirror their voting habits if they liked the research.
I dont think that will work, eventhough its selected from a decentralised network these kind of endorsement committee's will be very centralized by nature and more importantly will not convey the behaviour
of a larger crowd (the so called wisdom of the crowd). If you put a mandatory selection to it then you just end up with masternode owners in there who will still be desinterested in the voting process and
they will get completely overshadowed by the few who are interested .. and all of this taking place in a very small group.
I think we should keep the masternode voting as how it is working currently, without any smaller panels weighing budget proposals for the larger group.
Maybe create some analysing tools for masternode owners to more efficiently analyse budget proposals and their progress.