Sure, if you want me to start on the prosecution's work for free I'll be happy to oblige. Public interest and all that. To wit, your lies:
False. Please provide proof WRT:
probation, violation of
conviction, type / promises not kept
Violated probation:
Promises not kept:
Your first singles were "pre-ordered" in November 2011. They were supposed deliver 1,050 Mega Hash / second (+/- 10% running variance) at 19.8 W and be delivered towards the end of that month.
Your first singles were delivered in late February / early March 2012 (three months late). They work ~800 Mh, and not 832 Mh, which was your revised spec. Scumbags that you are you claim that 800 is "within the advertised 10% tolerance" conveniently forgetting to point out that said tolerance applies to 1050 Mh, which you never met. In reality, you are 23.8% under spec. They draw 80 Watts. That puts you 304% over spec for power consumption.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
False. Provide proof.
There you go. For the record, the guy was supposedly going to "answer" at some point in September. It's been four months.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
False. Provide proof.
There you go.
Props for proving that worthless "news sites" a la yahoo will actually publish scammy "press releases" signed by "Nick W". I guess that's why nobody's been reading them for what, twenty years now? Good job.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
False. Provide proof or evidence to the contrary.
Fully documented by ngzhang.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
False. Please provide proof.
Your proof will be delivered this year, possibly in a sealed envelope. Have fun.
False. Given the fact that you seem to think just stating something with evidence to back up your claims constitutes "proof," it's no surprise that you make a statement like this. However, you are categorically unable to provide any evidence or proof to bolster your claims. Every claim I make/made can be backed up by hard evidence. Every claim you have made has absolutely no substance or facts to back them up. Not a single one.
Except exactly the other way around. FPGA boards promised for November, then December, then early, then whatever. Delivered in March-May. ASICS promised for October, then November, then first week of December, then early January, currently March. Literally a dozen lies about time.
So here it is: every claim I made is entirely and univocally backed by facts, pretty much everything you say is either stupid, a lie or both. And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
False. Provide proof.
I should provide proof of your incorporation status? Because you're retarded or what exactly is the rationale here?
Not the case. Last time we met twas you who slunk off into silence, which makes me wonder why exactly you think this one's going to be different, Rakim?
And for that matter, every time I went after someone so far, that someone went down. It didn't take them long, either, just like it won't take you long, not past this point. Pirate made it from April till August, let's see if you make it January to June, shall we?
No, not according to me. According to the market. That exact market which currently values your "modicum" of a scam masquerading as a company somewhere between what I paid for the last pair of shoes I bought and what I paid for lunch yesterday.
A little more complicated than that: you demand proof for things that are widely known and amply documented. If the OP presents you that proof you claim they "repeat the same information in the vain hope that if you say it enough times it might be believable". If the OP doesn't bother with your retarded ass you claim they "slink off in silence". It's right there in this latest installment of nonsense, he's pretty much saying it outright.
No, actually, the arsenal is this:
1. Your original CEO was a convicted felon on probation (he pleaded guilty). Being involved in BFL was in violation of the terms of his probation. Him not telling anyone about it was certainly shady. The crime for which he was convicted (upon pleading guilty) is sensibly the same thing you're doing now: taking people's money for vague promises you don't actually keep.
1. Your original CEO was a convicted felon on probation (he pleaded guilty). Being involved in BFL was in violation of the terms of his probation. Him not telling anyone about it was certainly shady. The crime for which he was convicted (upon pleading guilty) is sensibly the same thing you're doing now: taking people's money for vague promises you don't actually keep.
False. Please provide proof WRT:
probation, violation of
conviction, type / promises not kept
Violated probation:
Quote
The defendant shall not engage, as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving loan programs, gambling or gaming activities, telemarketing activities, investment programs or any other business involving the solicitation of funds or cold-calls to customers without the express approval of the Probation Officer prior to engagement in such employment.
Promises not kept:
Your first singles were "pre-ordered" in November 2011. They were supposed deliver 1,050 Mega Hash / second (+/- 10% running variance) at 19.8 W and be delivered towards the end of that month.
Quote
Friday - November 4th, 2011
Production is underway on our initial run of pre-order units. As a member of this program, we invite you to review the photos below. Professional photographs are scheduled for early next week, but in the meantime these candid shots should answer most of your questions about the size and shape of the final delivered BitForce SHA256 Single.
Release schedule: We're currently working on final MCU firmware and software device drivers. It is our expectation this will complete within a two week time frame. Note: Members of our packet verification product program will receive a different firmware package and your deliveries will be staged based on final firmware for your application.
Production is underway on our initial run of pre-order units. As a member of this program, we invite you to review the photos below. Professional photographs are scheduled for early next week, but in the meantime these candid shots should answer most of your questions about the size and shape of the final delivered BitForce SHA256 Single.
Release schedule: We're currently working on final MCU firmware and software device drivers. It is our expectation this will complete within a two week time frame. Note: Members of our packet verification product program will receive a different firmware package and your deliveries will be staged based on final firmware for your application.
Your first singles were delivered in late February / early March 2012 (three months late). They work ~800 Mh, and not 832 Mh, which was your revised spec. Scumbags that you are you claim that 800 is "within the advertised 10% tolerance" conveniently forgetting to point out that said tolerance applies to 1050 Mh, which you never met. In reality, you are 23.8% under spec. They draw 80 Watts. That puts you 304% over spec for power consumption.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
Quote
2. Upon the public discovering your CEO was a convicted felon, you tried to cover it up.
False. Provide proof.
There you go. For the record, the guy was supposedly going to "answer" at some point in September. It's been four months.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
Quote
3. Upon the cover-up not working, the CEO/board was secretly shuffled, and then you & sockpuppet bunch tried to pretend 1 never actually happened.
False. Provide proof.
There you go.
Props for proving that worthless "news sites" a la yahoo will actually publish scammy "press releases" signed by "Nick W". I guess that's why nobody's been reading them for what, twenty years now? Good job.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
Quote
4. Your original product was a fraud, in the sense it wasn't something you developed, it was a high end, end of life product you bought on the cheap and sanded off. This was eventually discovered and publicly documented, but mum's the word from your side. This leaving to the side the fact it was late and out of spec - maybe you got lucky at the last minute and otherwise your scam would have ended last year, who knows.
False. Provide proof or evidence to the contrary.
Fully documented by ngzhang.
And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
Quote
5. Your business model, whereby you take money from idiots and call their contribution "pre-orders" when it's really equity is also fraudulent, and if you ever end up in court this will likely blow the lot of you to jail. You're not allowed to take "pre-orders" for products that at that time do not exist.
False. Please provide proof.
Your proof will be delivered this year, possibly in a sealed envelope. Have fun.
Quote
6. You have consistently been proven wrong about pretty much any statement involving time you made. We're counting North of a dozen occurrences by now.
False. Given the fact that you seem to think just stating something with evidence to back up your claims constitutes "proof," it's no surprise that you make a statement like this. However, you are categorically unable to provide any evidence or proof to bolster your claims. Every claim I make/made can be backed up by hard evidence. Every claim you have made has absolutely no substance or facts to back them up. Not a single one.
Except exactly the other way around. FPGA boards promised for November, then December, then early, then whatever. Delivered in March-May. ASICS promised for October, then November, then first week of December, then early January, currently March. Literally a dozen lies about time.
So here it is: every claim I made is entirely and univocally backed by facts, pretty much everything you say is either stupid, a lie or both. And yet, inexplicably, you have the gall to call my statement false. How do you go through life without a spine, you piece of shit?
Quote
7. Your logo is lifted off the Internet. The company registration is either bought off a bankrupt company or else an outright sham - nobody knows at this point. You make false claims of experience based on this bought off/stolen registration.
False. Provide proof.
I should provide proof of your incorporation status? Because you're retarded or what exactly is the rationale here?
Again, you consistently make accusations and claims without anything to back them up. When you are pressed on any of the points, you blabber about irrelevant topics, repeat the same information in the vain hope that if you say it enough times it might be believable or you slink off in silence.
Not the case. Last time we met twas you who slunk off into silence, which makes me wonder why exactly you think this one's going to be different, Rakim?
And for that matter, every time I went after someone so far, that someone went down. It didn't take them long, either, just like it won't take you long, not past this point. Pirate made it from April till August, let's see if you make it January to June, shall we?
Otherwise, you're just a lying scammer working for a pathetic "Stock Exchange" that has a market value (according to you) of over 45 billion dollars or something absurd like that. Good luck.
No, not according to me. According to the market. That exact market which currently values your "modicum" of a scam masquerading as a company somewhere between what I paid for the last pair of shoes I bought and what I paid for lunch yesterday.
Inaba logic: If you demand proof for something already proven and publicly accepted months ago you can make it appear as if it didn't happen. 
A little more complicated than that: you demand proof for things that are widely known and amply documented. If the OP presents you that proof you claim they "repeat the same information in the vain hope that if you say it enough times it might be believable". If the OP doesn't bother with your retarded ass you claim they "slink off in silence". It's right there in this latest installment of nonsense, he's pretty much saying it outright.