That's incorrect. What I'm saying is that due to the circumstances of the instamine, who can tell? Assuming that the dash numbers are all separate miners is absurd, but it's the only way you could assert that dash has an equal to, or greater than, distribution as Bitcoin in the first year--not that that in itself makes dash well distributed (many hate Satoshi's % and will point to that as to why BTC hasn't seen mass adoption).

Also, you should probably stop pointing to my name, as yours (and your brainfart assertions) leads one to believe that you are describing yourself---the day nuance equals generalization, is the day you'll have one up on me.