Ok... you do know that I asked for proof right? What you've provided is you restating the same statements you've already made. Proof requires an outside authority qualified to speak on the matter.
Stop. You are wrong. Your logical fallacy is:
Appeal to Authority.
.......
Inaba's question could simply be rephrased as a request for external arbitration by an acknowledged expert in a field, who would need to provide provable conclusions. It's not an appeal to authority, which instead would be a statement such as "Well, Stephen Hawking thinks you're wrong".
Would you want medical advice from an engineer, or engineering advice from a circus gymnast? Or an opinion about climate change from a geologist?
That's all. Please do continue.