You consider all signature campaign participants as shit posters, but allow drivel like this to be posted? How is this in any way or form constructive? Is this a crusade to crucify signature posters and an attempt to divide people on this forum?

I joined this signature campaign, because I support Bitcoin anonymity and this service is one method to accomplish those goals. The payment I receive to accomplish this, is a added bonus.

Signature posters add a lot of value in the form of traffic and content creation for this forum. The campaign managers are responsible to manage this in a responsible manner and signature participants should adhere to the rules. If a participant in these campaigns become a nuisance or a annoyance, and they are deemed to be a Sig spammer, some actions must be taken to deal with this.

This should also be applicable to all other members, not participating in these signature campaigns. Not wearing a paid signature, should not give you a free pass to post drivel and to insult other members.

Before you flame me for this post, consider this : Anything I post in the Meta section, do not qualify for payment as stipulated by the signature campaign rules.