Sorry I misspoke.  Where I said SafeCoin I meant to write MaidsafeCoin.  There are so many layers of kludge it's confusing.   

Let's try it again:


MaidsafeCoin is bound to SafeCoin via a Rube Goldberg layer of chutes and ladders that may leak privacy.

Of course you'd rather talk up Safenet's internals than address concerns about the anonymity of the payment interface.

Other than some vague reference to people at universities, are any well known cypherpunks reviewing the SafeCoin<->MaidsafeCoin scheme?

Since people's lives might depend on that scheme being untraceable/unlinkable/private, I don't understand the resentment towards scrutiny.

Unless you're only here for the pump and dump....