Concentrate on your own project instead of baselessly attacking others.
Nice try but:
1. No one is
attacking. I
criticize the instamine because it was a dishonest scam, and I criticize Dash because it continues to scam investors by lying about the instamine, and its technology is described by recognized exports as very good either. But hey, you seem like a decent guy for the most part. Misguided with your spam threads, and obviously misled about Dash, but decent anyway.
2. The criticism of Dash is not baseless. Some of the basis is quoted below, but there is plenty more
"half-truth, half-spin"
Sorry, but as inconvenient as it might be for you or the ongoing Dash scam, all of my comments below are obviously factual, and fully backed up by sources, not half-truth, and not spin.
1. Evan had at least two years of experience with crypto before launching Dash. There was no "lack of experience" as you claim. (Your statement about what "caused mistakes to be made" was opinion, by the way. I'm glad we have agreed to exclude opinion from this thread.)
2. Evan stated months ahead of the launch that he was working on a "for-profit" coin launch.
3. Evan deliberately withheld the development and feature plans until after the end of the instqamine.
4. Evan misled people about the launch schedule, launching much earlier than promised. During the first hour, over 500000 coins were mined, and in 8 hours, over a million coins.
5. Evan later cut the mining rewards and coin supply, increasing the effective size of the instamine by a factor of four or more.
6. In total, the instamine of 2 million coins represents approximately 30% of the current supply of Dash.
7. "Official Communication" from Dash blaming the instamine on inherited Litecoin code (which is factually false).
8. Dash ANN OP claiming the coin was "fairly and transparently launched".