Without Masternodes they would either secure a shitcoin without value or they wouldn't even bother to mine it.
Masternode network is what gives Dash value. Darksend and Instantx is there thanks to it.
On this I agree, but the rewards are grossly excessive for the services provided.
I showed the high school level probability math that masternodes make InstantX insecure. I've already retorted the "why don't you break it then?" bullshit, so I won't again.
Masternodes destroy the network effects that a coin needs to attain adoption. I had already explained why, so I won't again.
The Dash scammers and accomplices are always trying to spin their scam as something other than a scam. Sigh.
did the monero wrote that fact about infinite supply in their ann Huh if i was an investard in monero i would feel cheated if it isnt
No one can fork Monero without the support of the decentralized miners. The distinction from the Dash masternode scam, is that a masternode is staked only once with DRK (Dash tokens) and earns 50+% ROI per annum forever after for the largest holders of Dash tokens, thus further centralizing the coin meaning there is a centralized oligarchy which the investors are relying on for their future expecation of profits which afaics fulfills the Howey test for what is an investment security that is regulated by the Securities Act. A decentralized PoW miner is constantly expending on electricity in a competitive free market. Owning a lot of Monero doesn't give you any leverage as a miner.
I showed the high school level probability math that masternodes make InstantX insecure...Masternodes destroy the network effects that a coin needs to attain adoption.
Thats strange. I wonder why he didnt listen.
The thing is, bedroom wannabees that "nearly" wrote the new Microsoft Word and spend all day long trashing real projects on bitconitalk form such a rich source of authoritative technical appraisal.
Evan should understand that.
Maybe if you re-assert your awesome pedigree he'll entertain you

(You've sure entertained us).
Quoted for posterity, so we can refer to this in retrospect when we can more clearly see who was the (ad hominem hurling[1]) fool here.
Btw, Evan did reply on my thread and did not deny the math error. He tried to claim it was an honest mistake, yeah right.

Then he disappeared upon being challenged.
[1] I suppose that is the first listed "talent" on your resume. I've never seen you respond factually nor display any significant technical acumen.