Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Scum Accusation: Fortune Jack
by
TwitchySeal
on 17/04/2016, 01:34:37 UTC
FFS I didn't say FJ definitely didn't scam people, I said it's not quite the scam in a classic meaning. Which is not.

I quoted exactly what you said.  It wasn't that.

The main issue here is that contest had no clear terms and conditions and it didn't get as much interest as FJ expected

No, the contest terms were clear enough to conclude that FortuneJack did not honor them, this is the the main issue.

Those who did enter the contest should not suffer because others did not.


To summarise, in my opinion, lack of clear rules should be judged more (but not entirely) in favour of participants. FJ should apologise and look to settle the matter by paying out at least according to the table, so:

4-10: 3 btc total: ~0.43 each
11-30: 3 btc total: 0.15 each

But you should give FJ right to reject very low-quality vids (if there are such at all).

Hopefully that would settle it.

I agree, and Fortune Jack had plenty of opportunity to do the right thing.  They chose not to.

I don't enjoy making these threads, I do it because I don't think anyone else will if I don't.  Players were asking FJ whats up with the contest on April 2.  They kept asking.  Almost a week before making this thread, I told them if they didn't respond I would be making issue more public.  If they had explained specifically why each video not getting a prize didn't qualify (and it made sense) and paid those that did .3 BTC I would never have created thread.