1) WHO are you? I.e. you are posting as ionomy but who are you behind that handle. Failure to state this means you are hiding and not wanting to be transparent as ion states since you are moving on from the garza bad times. So again. WHO ARE YOU?
Unfortunately it seems there is no escaping the Garza days.
I read Ionomy is going to be added to the GAW thread so it's all now going to be more of the same.
Two sides. One calling scam, one saying not. Same people, same war.
It's a shame as it won't be effective for anything and will just cause many people to tune out of the ongoing argument.
If it's genuine then they can come up with a registered company number, link to online resource proving it and a list of the founding members & board, surely?
I agree with people wanting straight answers on legit questions. I think @Ionomy could try harder to give these answers.
For instance. Who is behind the handle Ionomy and the asked for company data. It shouldn't be hard to answer these questions nor it should take this long. Not a good start in an, as you knew before, pretty hostile environment.
I get the feeling that questions are not always answered straight foreward.
Straight question---> straight answer. I think that is the only way to convince people here that you are legit.
