Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)
For me it looks we stucked here 
Let me clear my point:
1. What will change if details about company are public, yes this information would be and should be public, but what does it really change, like ie. who of you send them flowers and who visited mordica and co and their headquarters which was at this time an obvious scam
? Anybody? What did it change on scam except that they tried to make it look legal and my friends, exactly this was the reason why so many people outside of crypto trusted this Mexican Sobrero. Now I don't understand, if they are scam why should they be geniuine?
Let me clear my point:
1. What will change if details about company are public, yes this information would be and should be public, but what does it really change, like ie. who of you send them flowers and who visited mordica and co and their headquarters which was at this time an obvious scam
? Anybody? What did it change on scam except that they tried to make it look legal and my friends, exactly this was the reason why so many people outside of crypto trusted this Mexican Sobrero. Now I don't understand, if they are scam why should they be geniuine?First of all, it's the LIE that matters. Trust and all that.
Second, if the company is just a shell company without any assets (most likely) then it should be a major red flag as well. I know nobody cares about such things because this is crypto, but it doesn't mean this should not be exposed.
5. Ionomy, why is it discussed here, only because they caused death of xpy?
ionomy is created by the same deluded gang of Garza's asslickers who tried to keep XPY afloat for a year.
This discussion is interesting (at least to me) as it highlights the uncanny similarities between the two projects - people involved, premine, demand of unconditional trust, lack of tangible product, hiding in their walled garden, I could go on but I think you get the idea.