Re: [neㄘcash, ᨇcash, net⚷eys, or viᖚes?] Name AnonyMint's vapor coin?
Man the patronizing BS is really insulting to the point of being "Not Getting It" hilarious.
Wrong. The patronizing BS is factual, not insulting.
I can't believe you are incapable of understanding what I wrote in the prior post.
Your tiny small corner of the internet is not relevant to my plans. What part of that can't you seem to grasp?
Please don't fill up my thread with noise. I realize you are trying to bury my posts upthread wherein I shared with my readers here my phenomenal type theory research level insight attained today. If you continue this tactic, I will be forced to delete your posts.
Please stop insinuating I need the respect of those who you think I need and the way you think I need to obtain it. It is quite annoying and humorous given I've been earning respectaccomplishments for 30 years in this industry. That your small circle respects or doesn't respect me, is irrelevant to me and my current plans and goals.
The gimp work you did on a dot matrix printer driver in the 1980s doesn't apply to modern crypto and ecash.
Cripes man, review my LinkedIn. I've been involved with two x 1 million user products since WordUp, also EOS Photomodeler and other work.
And I don't want your reply about my LinkedIn. And such trolling response will be deleted because it is wasting my scarce time.
Lack of respect is only neutral. You obviously feel vastly entitled to unearned respect by concluding lack of respect can only be disrespect.
How many times have I already told you that I do not need your respect nor the respect of your tiny corner of the internet.
Your crypto-currency delusions are irrelevant little fish and btw get off my lawn and stop wasting my time. I am implementing plans for something much bigger than just unscalable, nefarious crypto-currency.
It is annoying Moneropridetards like you that make me start to hate Monero's community again. Please go away. And stay gone.
Why would you think that Monero is the center of every programmer's universe.
Of course not. I am doing important work every day and earning the accomplishments I need for my plans and goals. Just because you can't understand what is being accomplished, doesn't make you an omniscient authority.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
You don't comprehend the evidence. Information looks like noise to a someone who lacks the knowledge to understand the technical details. ArtMine and I saw how you screwed up the Segregated Witness understanding. And there are so many examples. You are eloquent with words, but you aren't a top level programmer. So again, get off my lawn. You are wasting my time.
You don't do anything every day but froth and foam about crazy nonsense. Nobody (except that one guy) cares about your "Research level insight" (LOOL) into Rust vs Haskell typing.
Hahaha. You just put your foot in your mouth. That one guy is the co-author with Oleg on HList and OOHaskell papers. If you don't know who the type theory god Oleg is then that exemplifies why you don't understand the subject matter.
Btw, the other guy you failed to notice, was supporting my original stance about the superiority of functor enumeration versus iterators, and his first linked reference is a masterpiece from Oleg (make sure you view the cited References at the end).
Do you even know how to use github?
https://github.com/shelby3/
Don't worry, I will make sure you eat all you words. Be ready.