Re: [neㄘcash, ᨇcash, net⚷eys, or viᖚes?] Name AnonyMint's vapor coin?
Okay thanks. I should have checked that (my mind off in YouTube, lol). I'll delete both our posts (and keep this one) to cut down on clutter.
The original was not deleted. Maybe they just didn't like the crosspost for whatever reason.
Does anyone have any clue why the mods would delete this factual post 
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
Human populations don't grow faster than Moore's law. Duh.
Disk arrays scale to anything we can fathom.
The issue is that no block chain consensus can maintain decentralization of validation, not because of scaling problems but because of the fundamental economic reality that not every miner can have an equal share of the hashrate, thus verification costs are not shared equally. The creates an asymmetry where economies-of-scale will maximize profit and grow hashrate the fastest thus centralizing mining.
The solution requires some clever innovation on proof-of-work.
Quote
How does Monero propose to resolve the fact that it's blockchain is growing faster than Moores Law and pruning is so limited?
Human populations don't grow faster than Moore's law. Duh.
Disk arrays scale to anything we can fathom.
The issue is that no block chain consensus can maintain decentralization of validation, not because of scaling problems but because of the fundamental economic reality that not every miner can have an equal share of the hashrate, thus verification costs are not shared equally. The creates an asymmetry where economies-of-scale will maximize profit and grow hashrate the fastest thus centralizing mining.
The solution requires some clever innovation on proof-of-work.