I am not obliged to faithfully believe Armstrong's "Supercomputer." Just show persuasive arguments backed with facts.
THanks.
No one demanded you to do so. You retain your free will and can lose or gain from your decisions.
You are welcome to compile the data yourself and build your own model. In the meantime, I make judgements based on discernment.
I believe if you challenge MA in email, he will provide the raw data to you and some direction on his methodology.
I believe the charts he showed are displaying generally available data.
As for the backtested predictability of the correlation of societal change, I think you need $billion to compile the data Armstrong claims to have compiled and multi-dimensionally cross-correlated.
The cited backtested model for the Maunder Minimum 2030 prediction has 95+% backtested accuracy and is an open sourced scientific discovery. It doesn't come from Armstrong's database and computer.
While there is a body of scientific literature discussing the probability of a coming mini ice age, this is credited as existing by Armstrong, and is not predicted by him or his computers.
As for the rest of your comments, it's up to him (or you) to back the claims made with proof. Not my job.