Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Original owner of Avirunes wants his account back.Please help
by
PassThePopcorn
on 01/05/2016, 10:12:34 UTC
Quote from: Timelord2067 on May 01, 2016, 09:27:10 AM
Quote from: Avirunes on May 01, 2016, 09:08:06 AM
Quote from: Timelord2067 on May 01, 2016, 08:59:23 AM
1NuYgr8p1pu8MkfEtkynebL4b4mjjdRz9E sends 15aJtBnnvEF8zwUeo1bM6gc95KRRDNWPnP funds.

1NuYgr8p1pu8MkfEtkynebL4b4mjjdRz9E sends 1SamNZsRh1CqFxR9JyqF6EsQ8iv3QgrRT funds just once in the 50 most recent transactions.

Wallet 1SamNZsRh1CqFxR9JyqF6EsQ8iv3QgrRT is the subject of stolen BitCoins:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=518486.msg7066011#msg7066011
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619645.msg7066329#msg7066329
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589433.msg6904002#msg6904002

Then it all clears. Wewillallbeforgotten is scammer afterall. Marvellous work TIMELORD2067. You are Sherlock Holmes of bitcointalk.org  Cheesy

Thanks for your good wishes, this is the negative trust I have given Wewillallbeforgotten

Quote
Claims to be the original owner of Avirunes but cannot provide signed message, *but* admits being owner of linked Wallet address 1SamNZsRh1CqFxR9JyqF6EsQ8iv3QgrRT that has an unresolved (?) Stolen BitCoins accusation against it.

If Wewillallbeforgotten can sign a message from either

Code:
1NuYgr8p1pu8MkfEtkynebL4b4mjjdRz9E
1SamNZsRh1CqFxR9JyqF6EsQ8iv3QgrRT

Then they are the likely original owner of your account (How ActSeller got a hold of it is another question entirely)
Before giving negative trust that 1Sam account might have done nothing wrong but played at Luckybit (edit* or funnybtc.com - it seems funnybtc.com was also a gambling site), the person that says he was scammed was scammed by a website called funnybtc, who then spent the BTC on a wager at Luckybit. The funds then flowed from a luckybit wallet to a luckybit wallet and 1Sam. Unless I was missing something.

Maybe I am mistaken but the scam accusation against the 1Sam / luckybit is not very detailed. I do still believe that the account should not be given to Wewillallbeforgotten and should remain with the current account holder for other reasons, mostly Wewillallbeforgotten has failed to provid sufficient evidence that he owns the account other than that he at one time owned the account.

The evidence of being able to login to a Blockchain.info account is not actual evidence, they've been hacked so many times he could just have the user information.