Boy, are you Sirs gonna feel foolish when it turns out that Dr. Wright is really Mr. Satoshi.
And if he isn't?
| Is Satoshi | Is NOT Satoshi | |
| You denied Him | Lose infinitely | Win very little |
| You didn't deny | Win very little | Lose nothing |
| Result: | Infinite loss  | Meh, 0. Nothing lost |
I don't lose anything by denying him.
I learn, I grow, it's how I've outpaced the others this long
Let me say this:
1. Craig Wright's personality is directly the opposite of Satoshi. Satoshi hated publicity, Craig Wright seems to adore it by the way he is acting.
2. Craig Wright's blog is full of errors and read's like a pretender's. The signature he provides is a fake, and the script he gives has a very obvious error too.
3. No one other than Gavin has been able to sway us into even considering him as Satoshi to begin with. We are basically debating all this on Gavin's word alone. Which isn't what Bitcoin's philosophy is about.
4. Craig Wright tried something similar to this back in December, and he pops up again now for Consensus 2016? Why?
5.
Is more legit than anything we've seen from him so far pubically.