dude noooo

I follow you and love your stuff but conspiracy theories?  You never go full conspiracy theory...

...unless you have sources? in b4 'disinfo agent'

I mean no disrespect, by the way.  Just saying, loved your writing in part because it didn't have the 'bias' (I dont know what word to use...slant? oh god) seen in the third dispatch.  First two felt more 'believable'

The CIA uses bitcoin to "...fund these dirty subordinates" may they be drug smugglers, militias, you name it.  What's the problem? They aren't the only ones using bitcoin for...'secret' operations.   


Then the "information" you received from your "sources" is invalid; don't just spread assumptions

There's literally nothing to take from this dispatch after reading it...not one tiny itsy-bitsy sliver of proof - proof on any one single claim?

Now I'm curious what the purpose of your dispatches are...

Keep it up bud cheers