Yeah, it's looking like this guy might really be satoshi. But he does need to provide better public proof and dispel the rumors and mass conspiracy theories already, seriously.
You mean better public proof other than the now debunked proof he has already provided? Ask yourself if this was truly Satoshi Nakamoto, the man credited with the creation of Bitcoin, why would he offer up proof that he knew would be debunked in a matter of hours, if not minutes, after if was published in the first place?
There is no way this is Satoshi, it is simply Craig's feeble attempt number 2 at fooling the gullible. Perhaps he will get it right the next time, after all "the third time's the charm."