Alt currencies are not investments in the eyes of existing law anyway.
With that strawman statement which does not address the points of the Howey test, you obviously do not comprehend the thread that was provided to you. You probably didn't even read it or read it carefully.
>>
There is nothing slander nor libel in demanding proper disclosure with all the technical details explained so that laymen investors can evaluate if this AMP token is a worthwhile investment.
Notice how when you start with the fact that AMPs are not an investment, you don't have an argument?
The technical details have been made available anyway, and every week, you have a chance at asking Greg whatever question you want. If you read the explanation, and don't understand something, you have to come and ask questions. You can't just say it's someone else's fault that you haven't learned.
It has been in commercial operation for a couple years.
You are referring to components of the system such as Special K or Microsoft's use of process calculi, but the devil is in the details. This usage of some components of his research has no bearing on whether any of this is applicable to Synereo.
Of course it has bearing, it's a content delivery network - that's what it does. They are not simply components, they are the foundation, and the tech stack that does the work.
You need to learn at least enough to be able to voice your specific questions, if you have doubts.
Ad hominem attacks are not going to get you there.