After deeper research into proofs of Craig Wright being Satoshi Nakamoto - it turned out that his signature is worthless. And heres why - http://cointelegraph.com/news/why-craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-nakamoto
So why would Gavin Andersen say that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto:
1. Gavin was tricked into thinking so
2. Gavin was hacked
3. Gavin is a liar
its not weird,i also think that this news will be blown soon,some couple of days ago i read on bbc that craight is satoshi nakamoto,but i never sure,and then now cointelegraph said he is not satoshi,lets war of media begin here So why would Gavin Andersen say that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto:
1. Gavin was tricked into thinking so
2. Gavin was hacked
3. Gavin is a liar
