Idiot is factual in this context, as evident by your inability to refute my refutation.
Your ideas about facts are far removed from the rest of the world and are again off-topic (so I am not going to waste my time bothering to refute such off-topic snide remarks from you).
You didn't rebut my point that a portion of the Sartre text (and especially if permutation combinations of portions) is a combinatorial explosion of possible preimages and thus your entire claim was erroneous.
Now please stop making incorrect statements.
I rebutted that article in the thread that Gmaxwell deleted and is hiding from the readers.
I basically pointed out that until CW reveals which portion of the Sartre text he claims to have signed, we can't conclude anything.