You could at a minimum disprove that any contiguous portion of the document can't match the hash.
No, you couldn't, and I explained why.
'backsplaining.
I've never heard of that word in this context. What does it mean?
So tell me the reason? Obviously I didn't ask the question to only receive a "yes".
Actually, it's not obvious at all why you asked the question, hence my glib answer. Your nonsense isn't worth my time.
I want you to prove you understand how cryptographic hash functions are constructed and prove you have knowledge about how collision attacks are often constructed. Because these are things I had researched in the past.
Why should I? I'm not the one making outlandish claims about the subject. You are, and I doubt (based on the fact that your posts are nonsense) that you have actually researched it in any capacity.
That is the sort of reply which the linked article explains you would make. So you've confirmed it. Thanks.
You're welcome.
