If you believe that, you are dumber than I thought.
Yes, I do believe I explained it.
If you feed the script a plain ASCII text file, you'll just claim he might have used UTF16. Or a PDF file, which can altered in infinitely many ways without affecting the text content. Or a JPEG of a photograph of a printout of the document. Or something else entirely.
Perhaps you're illiterate?
Please don't waste my time with your inane inability to understand rudimentary concepts.
Rudimentary concepts such as the fact that the binary representation of the document in question hasn't even been identified? And that there are infinitely many possible representations? I agree, if you don't understand such concepts, there is no point in wasting time discussing anything with you.
I will proceed to explain once you confirm that do not understand why MerkleDamgård construction is relevant? Either explain or admit you don't know. So I can proceed to teach you something. You are wasting my scarce time with your stalling/deception tactics and trolling.
No, you're the one wasting
my time. I don't have to explain anything. You do. And you're not. I can only assume by your lack of explanation that you can't produce one.
Next time you will realize not to fuck with me, because I know a lot more than you assume.
I assume you know nothing, so knowing more than that isn't much of an accomplishment. But please go ahead and demonstrate your accomplishment. We're all waiting.