I knew. Its not at all a reproach, no stilistic critics. I like.


No prob with that, terence, me too not. It was again not a reproach, I just asked.

I see, its not Dave, what speaks.

Its a misleading statement: Dave's wheelchair isnt a medal from the Army. Its not a medal from the Sheriff too not. Its reasoned by a motocycle-accident in the free-time. I know, you knew, Gleb. I clarify it for the who didnt know.

Well, this link:
I knew, the show isnt over. I supposed, the retraite of the falseplayer was only strategic.

Its a puzzle for the cops, not for us.

The sharpened cards of the falseplayer are backdating, hacked sources, manipulated digital signatures and corrupted witnesses. Thats expectable.

Dave was a forensic crack. The falseplayer means to be upper. Its a case for the forensic experts really.

At least, every claimed action of Dave in this relation is to control very, very profound. Dave was knocked out in the hospital very much. As well, Dave's compagnons can know very much of Dave's agenda. His buddy looks out quite as uncorruptible as Bud Spencer. Just this claimed director-state in the Hotwire Preemptive Intelligence Pty Ltd seems to be quite impossible. Yes, Hotwire Preemptive Intelligence Et cetera Et cetera, thats the meaningful name. Its the incredible style not of Satoshi. Its the style of someone with an incredible big mouth.

What was the name of Dave's company?

Its a stilistic difference, what is strikeing. What is the name of the blockchain? Is it meaningful?
Correct, the name of the blockchain is blockchain. Because its a chain of blocks. Thats Satoshi. No need to confuse someone by highblown nameing.

The stilistic traces are unmasking obvious and reliant more than fingerprints. The bigmouth of the falseplayers is nonoverlookable. Isnt it?

... BTW

Did you ever think about Gleb's style? Why is this style not a style of falseplayer?
Its not question of being loud or quiet nor a question of being polite or unpolite nor a question of being timid or impudent nor a question of being open or close.

Its a question of being honest or sly.

I have the impression, some have pains to discern the falseplayers here, as 50% were trusting CSW.