I don't understand what the point behind such threads is. The theories that those two people are Satoshi were disproved, and basically nobody really knows who Satoshi is (or was) at this time.
The point of the thread is to see what is the view of this forum's users on Satoshi's identity.
I am surprised that 15 % of the users that voted (at the time of writing this) considers Craig to be a viable candidate for Satoshi, although he has been caught presenting fabricated evidence and declines to present independently verifiable evidence to support his claims.
I feel certain sympathy for Satoshi apparently wanting to stay away from publicity, but I guess it is human curiosity to want to know who he is.