Re: Alts market if C. Wright moves coins from early blocks
I am aware of your past BCT posts about the inadequacies of asymptotic complexity arguments. 
I don't share your romantic guess of who created BitCON.
Btw, Craig says the name Satoshi comes from "the book" about the House of Morgan:
https://forum.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-discussion/the-name-satoshi-comes-from-satoshi-david-character-from-the-house-of-morgan-t7619.html
And Nakamoto means "in the book" in Japanese.
And Julian Assange knew Craig in 1996:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hozs5/wikileaks_on_twitter_wed_like_to_thank_satoshi/d2rdg7u
Don't forget that (I was told) a House of Rothschild person was sheltering Assange when he was still free in the UK. And note now how the UN is attempting to supercede the UK's authority on the case. There is always a globalist plan for these pawns, including Edward Snowden.
I think someone paid off Craig to discredit Matonis and Gavin. Gavin has now lost commit access.
The danger is not that BitCON fails, but that it becomes the new totalitarian digital currency.
Hope you are aware that ostensibly the Dr. Craig Wright can't be proven to have made the blog posts, which implicate him:
http://craigswright.com/
Meaning a failure of Bitcoin is not the big problem we face. I hope for the failure of Bitcoin instead of it scaling by becoming centralized. The danger is that many vested interests want Bitcoin to continue even if it is centralized. Centralization doesn't necessarily kill Bitcoin, unless the centralized controllers kill it. Too many tinfoil hats want Bitcoin to succeed and be "the better gold" even if it is centralized and controlled by the combination of China's miners, Larry Summers' 21 Inc., and Blockstream.
The annals of the crypto-currency arena is littered with ignonymous players. Similar to the birth history of President Obama, theymous and the Gman are nearly entirely ignonymous. I've seen only one photo of theyman. I can't find any LinkedIn for the Gman, his educational history, which high school he attended, and where he was born, even though most of his colleages at Blockstream have a LinkedIn. Googling "Gregory F. Maxwell" only returns an address and phone in Parker, Colorado and the following Wikipedia Commons page:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Gmaxwell-boat.jpg
I note the Gman's use of the "rascist" attack against both TPTB_need_war and against Zooko @ Z.cash. And in the above linked Wikipedia Commons, his support for viral "copyleft" licenses that force companies to refuse to use open source because they aren't allowed to keep any portion of their derivative works as proprietary code. In other words, some of sort of totalitarian socialist/Marxist philosophy similar to FSF's Richard Stalman. Dangerous.
Readers again you may want to quote this message because we can't be sure if mods won't get "happy finger" and nuke this post.
Edit: these 1996 posts by Julian Assange says everything you need to know about whether he is a eugenics globalist:
Do we really need your amatuer political views?
The problem however, is that artificial selection maybe the only way to select beneficial attributes at all. What is presently being selected
for in western societies is all the factors that lead to a lack of practice or belief in birth control. I'll let the reader think for a moment on just what those are. Perhaps we can also somehow test for and abolish the "Catholic" gene?
And I suppose Julian should decide whose morals are best subjugated by robber barons as a matter of practicality, i.e. Julian is person who is thinking about how to best organize society from the top-down:
One man can't accomplish what "Satoshi" did with such precision. It was a large group of experts. No doubt about it.
You guys who have no experience in doing something like this, love to have your James Bond fantasies. But you are completely out-of-touch with the reality of actually doing what "Satoshi" accomplished.
I don't share your romantic guess of who created BitCON.
Btw, Craig says the name Satoshi comes from "the book" about the House of Morgan:
https://forum.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-discussion/the-name-satoshi-comes-from-satoshi-david-character-from-the-house-of-morgan-t7619.html
And Nakamoto means "in the book" in Japanese.
And Julian Assange knew Craig in 1996:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hozs5/wikileaks_on_twitter_wed_like_to_thank_satoshi/d2rdg7u
Don't forget that (I was told) a House of Rothschild person was sheltering Assange when he was still free in the UK. And note now how the UN is attempting to supercede the UK's authority on the case. There is always a globalist plan for these pawns, including Edward Snowden.
I think someone paid off Craig to discredit Matonis and Gavin. Gavin has now lost commit access.
The danger is not that BitCON fails, but that it becomes the new totalitarian digital currency.
Hope you are aware that ostensibly the Dr. Craig Wright can't be proven to have made the blog posts, which implicate him:
http://craigswright.com/
Meaning a failure of Bitcoin is not the big problem we face. I hope for the failure of Bitcoin instead of it scaling by becoming centralized. The danger is that many vested interests want Bitcoin to continue even if it is centralized. Centralization doesn't necessarily kill Bitcoin, unless the centralized controllers kill it. Too many tinfoil hats want Bitcoin to succeed and be "the better gold" even if it is centralized and controlled by the combination of China's miners, Larry Summers' 21 Inc., and Blockstream.
The annals of the crypto-currency arena is littered with ignonymous players. Similar to the birth history of President Obama, theymous and the Gman are nearly entirely ignonymous. I've seen only one photo of theyman. I can't find any LinkedIn for the Gman, his educational history, which high school he attended, and where he was born, even though most of his colleages at Blockstream have a LinkedIn. Googling "Gregory F. Maxwell" only returns an address and phone in Parker, Colorado and the following Wikipedia Commons page:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d2/Gmaxwell-boat.jpg
I note the Gman's use of the "rascist" attack against both TPTB_need_war and against Zooko @ Z.cash. And in the above linked Wikipedia Commons, his support for viral "copyleft" licenses that force companies to refuse to use open source because they aren't allowed to keep any portion of their derivative works as proprietary code. In other words, some of sort of totalitarian socialist/Marxist philosophy similar to FSF's Richard Stalman. Dangerous.
Readers again you may want to quote this message because we can't be sure if mods won't get "happy finger" and nuke this post.
Edit: these 1996 posts by Julian Assange says everything you need to know about whether he is a eugenics globalist:
Quote from: Craig S. Wright
And what am I paying for...to protect the status quo. I believe that there is more than enough help for ppl available. They just need to get off their butts and work.
Do we really need your amatuer political views?
Quote from: Douglas B. Renner
The term "defect" is therefore entirely out of line. We have no business placing judgements from our own limited material value sets onto something which has the definite potential of affecting all future generations of Humanity. It's none of our business.
The problem however, is that artificial selection maybe the only way to select beneficial attributes at all. What is presently being selected
for in western societies is all the factors that lead to a lack of practice or belief in birth control. I'll let the reader think for a moment on just what those are. Perhaps we can also somehow test for and abolish the "Catholic" gene?
And I suppose Julian should decide whose morals are best subjugated by robber barons as a matter of practicality, i.e. Julian is person who is thinking about how to best organize society from the top-down:
"Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies, The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis, _God in the Dock_
but the most probable conclusion is Satoshi was one man and he was simply mistaken
One man can't accomplish what "Satoshi" did with such precision. It was a large group of experts. No doubt about it.
You guys who have no experience in doing something like this, love to have your James Bond fantasies. But you are completely out-of-touch with the reality of actually doing what "Satoshi" accomplished.