...
No, I'm pretty sure even people in the US should be recognising this as the toxic, paranoid, prejudiced, xenophobic drivel it is. I can assure you I feel no non-American angst, nor am I attempting to instil it in others. You can't rationally claim that a certain group of people within a set border are a problem whilst also stating that geographic location is irrelevant. Unless, y'know, you're insane, which I'm not ruling out as a possibility.
Don't particularly care about this guy's sanity, but sure, he can state that "a certain group of people within a set border are a problem whilst also stating that geographic location is irrelevant." He'd be right, too No, I'm pretty sure even people in the US should be recognising this as the toxic, paranoid, prejudiced, xenophobic drivel it is. I can assure you I feel no non-American angst, nor am I attempting to instil it in others. You can't rationally claim that a certain group of people within a set border are a problem whilst also stating that geographic location is irrelevant. Unless, y'know, you're insane, which I'm not ruling out as a possibility.
It doesn't matter where bitcoin mining is centralized, as long as *it's centralized somewhere.* If that "somewhere" happens to be China, then Chinese miners are responsible for [the problem of] Bitcoin centralization. If Bitcoin mining was controlled by handful of wholesome American boys in Detroit, Michigan, then American miners would be responsible.
Seems self-evident to me
Quote
Also, fun fact, not everyone in China is a communist, you stereotyping screwball.
Did he suggest that all Chinese were Communists?