Re: [RADS] Radium - Bringing Advanced Utility to the Blockchain
I dont understand this coin. Its one of the few coins I actually believe has quality devs, low coin count with a burn...it seems like a perfect coin to rise in value, but the communication isn't there. I have no clue whats being worked on right now. How can a coin build momentum if nobody knows whats going on? Its insane to me... Ive heard there are 4 to 6 debs working on this coin, why can't one of them give us some bi weekly updates on whats being done, whats finished, and whats in store in the future? I thought this coin had a PR person....What the fuck are they doing?
Come on. This isn't that hard to create some hype, and get the price back on track.
Come on. This isn't that hard to create some hype, and get the price back on track.
Long time reader, never posted before. Made an account just to agree with you and leave some ideas.
Some ideas:
- JJ, you should make it more clear you are involved with RADS. I follow you on Twitter and check all the updates, but I think at first glance people don't know you are associated with this project! Maybe tweet your tweets on the official RADS Twitter?
- A roadmap, because we're interested in upcoming features such as the implementation of the voting system
- Devs, introduce yourself on the RADS website or via a Youtube video! It instills a sense of stability and trust, plus we would all love to get to know you!
- I agree with the (bi)weekly updates, I'm very interested in what's going on and again, a degree of transparency on the dev side instills stability and trust. Plus it would just be cool to read ''The Weekly RADS Counter'', perhaps your project manager can work on this? If he is still on board.
This young coin has alot of potential, as is clear from the slack chat where we do get sneak peeks of what is in the works, and for once (which is odd in the altcoin scene) the ''online presence'' is lacking instead of the fundamentals!
Cheers!
Thanks, Carbs!
We appreciate the input. Quite a lot, actually - specific feedback like this is incredibly helpful. Quick question - can you expand on what you mean in regards to JJ clarifying his connection to RADS? Do you mean specifically on Twitter, in general, or both?
Sure I can, first off, it's great to hear from you!
I meant Twitter specifically, but now that I've taken a new look at his Twitter profile I see that he's updated his banner and profile picture, this will already help out alot I suppose. That still leaves the issue that the @ProjectRadium twitter has alot more followers than JJ. Now I don't mean that JJ cut off all his tweeting! Absolutely not. It was just that I was under the impression that some tweets would be better off if they came from the @ProjectRadium page instead of having to be RT'd from @JJ12880 's page.
Take these retweets for instance from the @ProjectRadium page, wouldn't it be better if they came from the @ProjectRadium and were retweeted from that source?
http://imgur.com/Q7kNbVC
It's just a formality really and the importance of this specific point is dwarfed by the other suggestions coined by the community and me.
As for more suggestions; I would not be opposed to a small crowd funding campaign to further development. I.e. bringing on board more devs or other talent (marketing perhaps, PR or community management, or legal advice if things start accelerating) to further strengthen Project Radium because I think at this point in time we are ready for more expansion. [Poll crowdfund yes/no: http://www.strawpoll.me/10183503 ]
Anyways, cheers!