I have to confirm that. - Mirrax = Conquerer just for clarification.
Regards,
ChekaZ
I am not miraks or Conquerer.
Right spelling is Mirrax/Conqueror
The link about is FTC team opinion which i do not share.
In fact i see such accusations as wrong and not acceptable.
This decision is huge shame for FTC team and will not be forgotten.
Sorry if I have this wrong, but here is what it looks to me what happened:
Kraken gave Mirrax 100000FTC to deliver as bounty for smart contract implementation. When the price shot up, Kraken gave direction to sell the FTC for BTC at 9500. Mirrax sold the coins at 4000 instead before it got that high. Now Kraken is asking for the funds returned and Mirrax is refusing to send anything (not 100000FTC, not 9.5BTC, not 4BTC). Is that correct? And are you the person making this decision to hold these funds? If so why? They were dedicated for smart contract creation, so the only person who should have a right to keep the funds indefinitely is the person who develops smart contracts for FTC.
Again sorry if I have this wrong, but what am I missing? What accusations are unacceptable?