Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT
by
JayJuanGee
on 13/05/2016, 22:03:20 UTC
Pfft. I'm not going to mislead people by failing to call it what it is-- going to have some secret meeting where you are massively outnumbered with no strong negotiator on your side where you let yourself get compelled to commit to random things which are either largely meaningless or violate other people's trust and confidence in you (or, in fact, commitments you made to others before leaving) is a truly foolish move, if not quite "publicly endorsing scammer-wright" grade.

It's not the end of the world, people screw up, shit happens, goes on on-- but someone here asked the question as to why Luke was going around polling segments of the community what kind of hardforks they'd find acceptable, and that is why. It is a disappointment because its likely to exacerbate and prolong some drama which could otherwise be largely over now.

Im not sure Greg, things are only this calm because of the agreement.

Like it or not a significant amount of 'economic majority' want hard fork asap and most likely 'economic majority' want a 'reasonable' hard fork soon.

DanielW:  What is your source for gauging what the "economic majority" wants?  And, what do you mean by hard fork?  Do you mean increase the blocksize limit,  change in governance, some combination of such, or something else?