Oh so you
now want to have the conversation now that you can't post missleading stuff than delete my replies? How cute.
Instead of doing that, he chose to attack Roadstress and me (I removed the 2nd post in which he attacks me).
The post you deleted is the post I've quoted in the OP, in its entirety. Again you've been caught lying and so you deleted my reply claiming it was "attacking you", but you didn't think I'd open an unmoderated thread.
Dogie is suing Spondoolies-Tech, so I can't engage him.
Not sure you know what "can't" means.
The invoice + receipt Dogie posted did indeed include his lawyer fees.
If you can find a lawyer handling an entire case for $8,600 then let me know. That receipt is for money on account, not for lawyer fees.
The problem here is that the entire payment to the lawyer was titled 'expenses' and therefore he did not pay VAT (as he should have).
If you're accusing my lawyer of VAT fraud, you're going to have a bad time.
Dogie can easily prove that this explanation is wrong by posting another invoice + receipt to his lawyer which is properly titled 'lawyer fees' and include VAT payment as required by the law.
Request it via the lawyer of that company you run... oh wait. If you're really that desperate to see an irrelevant piece of paper (Pekatete 2.0) then you could even call my lawyer and ask.
And while you've finally decided to ungag yourself, why don't you answer the 30 unanswered questions in your own thread? PS, if anyone should be posting receipts, it should be you posting your pay stubs along with an explanation of why staff and creditors were going unpaid.