I can't tell you how old he is. I swore to never tell. Obviously it isn't Vitalik. And it also isn't David Zimbeck, nor Charles Hoskinson, nor anyone from Bitshares.
I trust you'll keep us informed.
BTW, to everyone: I myself am uniformed with regard to the technical issues, but TPTB's description of his flash on inspiration - aftter a lot of work - rings true to me, at least in terms of how real inspiration-flashes come about. So to the extent to which the following is credible given my lack of technical expertise, I vouch for him.
The anonymity tech will be well explained for layman. I won't release some technobabble without clear explanations that you can explain to your teenage son.
If we proceed with this project, I think we will hold the explanation secret until very near to launch for obvious reasons that we would want first mover advantage.
I'll be composing a long post shortly to address your question about distribution.
Please note nothing has been fully negotiated yet. I am speaking hypothetically about potential deal that hasn't been signed yet. I am also working programming language design today which is another very deep technical topic, so my time is spread all over.
@Mr. Moore
I'm extremely interested in how you will solve the mining centralization issue that is destroying Bitcoin as we speak?
IMO this Bitcoin fork will redefine Bitcoin probably.
I'm extremely interested in how you will solve the mining centralization issue that is destroying Bitcoin as we speak?
IMO this Bitcoin fork will redefine Bitcoin probably.
I will say something about this in my next post.