If you don't like what Bitcoin's socioeconomic majority decides then take a cue from Cryddit. IE, stop whining, man up, and go use another socioeconomic majority's alternative Nakamoto Consensus associated coin/token.
It isn't that I don't like what Bitcoin's socioeconomic majority decides.
What I don't like is that they are refusing to even attempt to decide.
If people aren't even willing to work together, this will fail.
Bitcoin no gives fuck. Sorry.

Perfect response to yet more passive-aggressive, bossy, poutraged "Bitcoin and Bitcoiners *MUST* do what *I* prefer RIGHT MEOW, or they are SHIRLEY DOOMED" ragequitters.
Impatiently threatening Honey Badger with "fail" is hilarious, as it shows the extortionist has no clue what antifragility is all about. IE, if Bitcoin can fail due to asinine Process Concern Trolling then it doesn't deserve to exist.
Deciding not to decide is still a decision. After-the-fact quibbling about Process Concerns, just because you don't like the outcome of the process, is pathetic.
Whatever our social ties to and great esteem for Cryddit, the Satoshi's Holy Protocol is Blessedly immune to such sentimental appeals.
Honey Badger is in no way obligated to consider every motion for hard forking put before him.
The SEM can't exceed its legitimate authority with hard fork popularity contests, or else moral hazard ensues.
"I REALLY REALLY want to" isn't a good enough reasons to risk consensus failure in a controversial hard fork.
As Satoshi foretold, the block size will be increased "eventually" but
Sorry, Not Tonight Dear.It isn't that I don't like what Honey Badger does.
What I don't like is that Honey Badger is refusing to even attempt to give a shit.
If Honey Badger and the cobra/bees/zebra aren't even willing to work together, this will fail.
Perhaps the fun-loving Dogecoin community is a better fit for Cryddit. Shibes emphasize friendliness and going along to get along, which appears to be his primary Process Concern.