gavin's opinion is just as valid as maxwel's
No. Gavin's opinion is worth much less than damn near everyone's.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4kmum6/i_keep_reading_people_say_bitcoin_development_is/d3gnvtw
Quote
[]Mentor77 -7 points 3 days ago
And we're supposed to prefer your "release now, test later" approach? https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/pull/138#issuecomment-194675548
You lost the right to talk about "priorities" when you released XT as a production-ready client in the face of all technical knowledge regarding 8MB-->8GB block size. Even jtoomim contradicted that idiocy: https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/3ygo96/blocksize_consensus_census/cye0bmt
So did the IC3 study: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1420066.msg14381215#msg14381215
Basing BIP 101 on Moore's Law (completely unscientific, firstly, and secondly, it is already failing where applied as an industry standard) -- you lost all credibility. The Craig Wright fiasco was fuel to that fire. Go home, Gavin.
And we're supposed to prefer your "release now, test later" approach? https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/pull/138#issuecomment-194675548
You lost the right to talk about "priorities" when you released XT as a production-ready client in the face of all technical knowledge regarding 8MB-->8GB block size. Even jtoomim contradicted that idiocy: https://np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/3ygo96/blocksize_consensus_census/cye0bmt
So did the IC3 study: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1420066.msg14381215#msg14381215
Basing BIP 101 on Moore's Law (completely unscientific, firstly, and secondly, it is already failing where applied as an industry standard) -- you lost all credibility. The Craig Wright fiasco was fuel to that fire. Go home, Gavin.
I'd co-sign. Gavin is an embarrassment and a snake in the grass.
