Let me do some correction for you please:
Legend: Bolded name is my picked winner, after the '@' symbol is the odds
09:00 A Zverev v D Thiem 2016 French Open @ 1.26 W + 0.26
09:00 Parmentier v Bacsinszky 2016 French Open @ 1.24 W +0.24
09:00 SuÁrez Navarro v Cibulkova 2016 French Open @ 1.60 W +0.60
10:00 Gasparyan/Kuznetsova v Jurak/Konjuh 2016 French Open @ 1.28 W +0.28
11:00 Carreno Busta/Marrero v Stepanek/Zimonjic 2016 French Open @ 1.41 W +0.41
11:00 D Ferrer v Fel Lopez 2016 French Open @ 1.17 W +0.17
11:00 Herbert/Mahut v Kudla/Peralta 2016 French Open @ 1.20 L -1
13:00 Butorac/Lipsky v Kubot/Peya 2016 French Open @ 1.79 W +0.79
13:00 Gulbis v Tsonga 2016 French Open @ 1.49 L -1
15:00 Bertens v Kasatkina 2016 French Open @ 1.55 W +0.55
16:00 Maria/Mahut v Kudryavtseva/Bopanna 2016 French Open @ 1.55 W +0.55
1st Tally: +1.85
Quote from: Winner780 on May 28, 2016, 07:12:09 AM
Football for today
Legend: Bolded name is my picked winner, after the '@' symbol is the odds. Attention, the bet type is no draw bet, so there is a binary outcome, in an event of draw the bets are refunded.
09:00 Nagasaki v Jef Utd Chiba J2 League @ 1.71 D -1
09:30 C-Osaka v Okayama J2 League @ 1.49 W +0.49
09:45 Atletico Madrid (W) v Ath Bilbao (W) Primera Division (W) @ 1.53 W +0.53
13:00 KTP v Jaro Ykkonen @ 1.6 W +0.6
13:00 Roskilde v Skive Danish Division 1 @ 1.69 W +0.69
14:00 AIK v Orebro Allsvenskan @ 1.43 W +0.43
14:00 Melfi v Martina Franca Lega Pro @ 1.42 D -1
16:00 Rosenborg v Molde Tippeligaen @ 1.33 D -1
2nd Tally: -0.26
Total: +1.85 - 0.26 = 1.59 units profit
So my conclusion for this thread is that the OP can't calculate his profits properly and that his claims are completely false because his stated ROI is wrong on so many levels
I just can't stand false advertisement when I see one. If the OP thinks I am not accurate he can always prove me wrong here 
Profit (EV): 4.49
ROI: 449%
Winrate: 87.5%
Legend: Bolded name is my picked winner, after the '@' symbol is the odds
09:00 A Zverev v D Thiem 2016 French Open @ 1.26 W + 0.26
09:00 Parmentier v Bacsinszky 2016 French Open @ 1.24 W +0.24
09:00 SuÁrez Navarro v Cibulkova 2016 French Open @ 1.60 W +0.60
10:00 Gasparyan/Kuznetsova v Jurak/Konjuh 2016 French Open @ 1.28 W +0.28
11:00 Carreno Busta/Marrero v Stepanek/Zimonjic 2016 French Open @ 1.41 W +0.41
11:00 D Ferrer v Fel Lopez 2016 French Open @ 1.17 W +0.17
11:00 Herbert/Mahut v Kudla/Peralta 2016 French Open @ 1.20 L -1
13:00 Butorac/Lipsky v Kubot/Peya 2016 French Open @ 1.79 W +0.79
13:00 Gulbis v Tsonga 2016 French Open @ 1.49 L -1
15:00 Bertens v Kasatkina 2016 French Open @ 1.55 W +0.55
16:00 Maria/Mahut v Kudryavtseva/Bopanna 2016 French Open @ 1.55 W +0.55
1st Tally: +1.85
Quote from: Winner780 on May 28, 2016, 07:12:09 AM
Football for today
Legend: Bolded name is my picked winner, after the '@' symbol is the odds. Attention, the bet type is no draw bet, so there is a binary outcome, in an event of draw the bets are refunded.
09:00 Nagasaki v Jef Utd Chiba J2 League @ 1.71 D -1
09:30 C-Osaka v Okayama J2 League @ 1.49 W +0.49
09:45 Atletico Madrid (W) v Ath Bilbao (W) Primera Division (W) @ 1.53 W +0.53
13:00 KTP v Jaro Ykkonen @ 1.6 W +0.6
13:00 Roskilde v Skive Danish Division 1 @ 1.69 W +0.69
14:00 AIK v Orebro Allsvenskan @ 1.43 W +0.43
14:00 Melfi v Martina Franca Lega Pro @ 1.42 D -1
16:00 Rosenborg v Molde Tippeligaen @ 1.33 D -1
2nd Tally: -0.26
Total: +1.85 - 0.26 = 1.59 units profit
So my conclusion for this thread is that the OP can't calculate his profits properly and that his claims are completely false because his stated ROI is wrong on so many levels
I just can't stand false advertisement when I see one. If the OP thinks I am not accurate he can always prove me wrong here Profit (EV): 4.49
ROI: 449%
Winrate: 87.5%