I hope you don't take offense to my question; I am merely curious. Are you foreign (to English-speaking nations) or are you, like, 10-12 years old? Or both? I ask because it sort of changes my interpretations of what you've said above.


Either way, though, I sort of think the whole users thing is a bit overrated as a threat. I've been with Bitcoin since a little before this user account was created and believe it is solid enough for there to always be users using it in some way, regardless of what happens in the future.


Your second point is one I am a bit confused about and my question to you in my first paragraph comes into play the most as to my understanding of it. From what I am reading, you seem to think there is a single developer of Bitcoin that has such control as to shut down the Bitcoin network and/ or disrupt communications and control the supply and ownership. This is completely false and goes against everything Bitcoin is (decentralized, etc.). Much of the point of Bitcoin is to avoid said controls entirely. Bitcoin was designed with no central point of failure or control. I find it impossible to believe you could be involved in Bitcoin for 3 years and not know this, hence my question about your age and/ or English language skills. If so, it might be possible I am misinterpreting and you are actually just talking about the block-size debate?


This statement has no place in reality, in my opinion. Everything I've read leads me to the opinion that the governments couldn't care much about Bitcoin despite the attention some have paid to it. Even if they did, Bitcoin is hardly a money-making opportunity for them.