Re: RAWX altcoin exchange (former mcxNOW) to reopen soon | see a preview here
Please don't call me a liar. We clearly have a different view on some issues but that doesn't justify you accusing me of lying.
Maybe you have noticed that I never get personal here and even if that might be unusual in this forum I would very much appreciate if you could behave similarly.
Please acknowledge the fact that I was not responsible for any of the actions you mentioned and that there was no bug in the backend. That is all that matters for the future users of RAWX, because the backend is all that will be reused.
Maybe you have noticed that I never get personal here and even if that might be unusual in this forum I would very much appreciate if you could behave similarly.
Please acknowledge the fact that I was not responsible for any of the actions you mentioned and that there was no bug in the backend. That is all that matters for the future users of RAWX, because the backend is all that will be reused.
YOU ARE A LIAR!!!
This "backend only" crap is bullshit too. You're migrating mcxFEE over so there's clearly more going on here than just a quick code purchase, lucky for you crypto people as a whole aren't too smart so you and your silent partner RS can scam a whole new batch of noobs.
My bet is once you're up and running you'll do a fresh market dump of those shitty mcxFEE or whatever you rebrand them as. You will hold like 90% of the supply and do your best to entice a fresh new batch of people to unload that garbage on. I also predict many many promises that will never come to fruition on your wasteland of an exchange.
Well said .. i agree !
And enlightened.. "hit a nerve ?"
Nope.. you just don't get it.
The proposition here is dumb.
Who the fuck would go and re-launch GOX (for example) and then rail on about only using the back end ?
Or whining on about symantecs with verbal gymnastics over what constitutes a "hack"
You sound like JShock from Cryptsy when i fought him over the POINTS Hack incident he banned me over LOL
(he banned me from cryptsy chat for a year for saying they were "hacked" here on the forum)
What we all see here is a gullible fool who is either trying to work with RS or is RS himself.
You picked a bad path to take and it's showing.
Most of us probably would not even noticed if you pulled all this with out mentioning mcxNOW.
And it would have been easier to get it going with out bringing up the "stained" exchange.
So why take the resurrect mcxNOW route then ?
hmmm ? i smell mcxNOW Fee's hahahha
