BADlogic's scientific proof never passed the peer review stage, by both athiests and thiests. 
Badecker never had to respond to logical nonbelievers.
Since the logical nonbelievers don't have a logical rebuttal to the proof that God exists, there is nothing to respond to.
maybe, but and it is really a big deal if anyone doesn't believed in God and does not also believed in a creator for the existence of everything. Then where did we came from? From nothing that turned into a bubble and expanded into a big boom and there we were at. Who the someone did that bubble?
True science that follows the scientific method cannot prove or disprove God. It cannot now, and never will. Why? The same reason you cannot fly. Your not designed to fly, and science isn't designed to prove God.
Science is great, but like most things people can and do abuse it.This is when something called pseudoscience pops up. Pseudoscience to the untrained eye looks and feels just like science, but isn't really because it doesn't adhere to the scientific method.
Most of the time people make genuine mistakes, but not in BADlogic's case. He knows full well it's pseudoscience, yet continues to lie. This should give you a red warning flag straight away.
As for is a big deal if we believe in God or not. Well I guess that's up to the individual, but from Gods point of view is it a big deal? Science cannot answer that for you, nor can the circular logic based "the bible is the word of God, because bible says so" fallacy book.
Why not use your logic?
Does God give preference to one band of religious followers than another? No.
Does God give preference to those that worship him? No.
Does God give preference to atheists? No.
This only leaves us with two logical conclusions:
Either God doesn't exist, or God doesn't care what you believe in.
Take your pick.