Just in case he decides to delete it. (-:
You are asking who is developing/maintaining Silkcoin, we tell you straight that development has been discontinued. But responsibility lies with us. You cherry pick information and go about ranting oh then there is no one maintaining/developing... disregarding the fact that we do have control and are taking responsibility.
You idiot, the term exactly describes the situation we were in back in 2014 when the initial developer abandoned his blockchain, right before Arteleis took over control. I´m confident in naming things by its proper term, not that it matters because I don´t think you would ever reveal yourself or take action. You´re just an anonymous shill given way too much room. But hey, I'm here why not go with you to see how far you will go in your stupidity.
Make sense now bro?
Hopefully one day your team and it's 'followrrs' stop talking in circles and answer strait up questions and criticisms to avoid personal conflict with unknown aggrrssors pissed off for the simplest of reasons.
Block explorer fiasco is a great example. Keep your ship together captain. As it would appear you're the only true leader here.
You presume you are only talking to either followers or developers, lol. You're pissed off regardless of reason and this thread is here just to piss you off so you're in the right place.
Block explorer is not a fiasco just because you go on a tantrum and deem it so. Cost/benefit had been considered, a decision was made against it for that time. The reason for it has been stated before.
I've always been in favor of a moderated thread. Developers like to uphold transparency and decentralization to a fault, afraid power would eventually be abused. To me you present a nice case against this decision. It's not that you want to that matters, what matter is that you are able to kick unwanted guests out of your house. I guess we'll continue the riot until then, 2022.