Badecker never had to respond to logical nonbelievers.
Since the logical nonbelievers don't have a logical rebuttal to the proof that God exists, there is nothing to respond to.

maybe, but and it is really a big deal if anyone doesn't believed in God and does not also believed in a creator for the existence of everything. Then where did we came from? From nothing that turned into a bubble and expanded into a big boom and there we were at. Who the someone did that bubble?
This is a reasonable point. Some day science will find something that shows that Big Bang was impossible. Right now there are at least 3 solid forms of BB Theory. This shows that science doesn't know for a fact that BB was real.
Evolution from inanimate materials to life is mathematically impossible. It is so firmly impossible that we don't have any logical way to even begin to show how something like evolution could even start to be possible. See
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.0.
When you combine the scientific facts of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy, you get a result that says that God exists. If God didn't exist, at least one of these 3 scientific facts would have to NOT exist as well. Since they all exist, God MUST exist.
All our machinery, chemistry and physics comes from what we see in nature. We build our machinery based on nature and what we find in nature. Nature still has natural machinery that is greater than anything that we can build. Since it is machinery, our example of building our machinery shows that machines need to have intelligent makers. The machinery of nature is no different. The Maker of the machinery of nature is God.
The thing that I don't understand is why intelligent scientists would want to fight against God. Since they know that He exists, why not accept the truth and build science around the fact of God? In all their scientific logic, the fundamental foundation of it, that God does not exist, is not logical.
