Re: Breaking: Shuffle-based Provably Fair Implementations Can Cheat Players (proof)
Glad I am not a fan of table games 
Can't agree more. I am not sure if many investors are aware of this possibility especially the ones with relatively high Profit/EV.
How the system works exactly is still beyond me but I can't see the logic on the relatively complex way it is implemented or the mystery behind the 30.
But how is this?
Another important threat in the bitcoin space is investment based sites, there's absolutely no way to know if the owners will play against the house and steal from investors in an undetectable manner.
Can't agree more. I am not sure if many investors are aware of this possibility especially the ones with relatively high Profit/EV.
Ps, there is actually one dice site "pocketdice" that uses "initial random numbers" which was proven to have a bad provably fair implementation (for more simple reasons than OP 
) Unfortunately they still didn't improve this.
) Unfortunately they still didn't improve this.How the system works exactly is still beyond me but I can't see the logic on the relatively complex way it is implemented or the mystery behind the 30.
But how is this?
The client's seed is not really used to generate the random result.